Dear Jonathan,
Yes, I considered "vertical_component_of_curl_of_surface_downward_stress"
too, but decided to propose the shorter one. I quite understand your desire
for consistency of formulation and have no problem accepting your
alternative. However, since we have already tooled up for my proposal, it
would be more *convenient* for us if you choose
"vertical_component_of_surface_downward_stress_curl". Perhaps you could
define it as an alias? Your call.
Best regards,
Bruce
2016-09-23 18:23 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Gregory <j.m.gregory at reading.ac.uk>:
> Dear Bruce
>
> > divergence_of_surface_downward_stress
>
> looks fine. We have a couple of other divergence_of_X names. In view of
> this,
> would it be OK to have
>
> > vertical_component_of_curl_of_surface_downward_stress
>
> instead of
>
> > vertical_component_of_surface_downward_stress_curl
>
> for consistency of syntax, although it's slightly more cumbersome?
>
> Best wishes and thanks
>
> Jonathan
>
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bruce Hackett Senior Scientist
Norwegian Meteorological Institute (MET Norway), R & D Dept.
P.O. Box 43 - Blindern e-mail: bruceh (at) met (dot) no
N-0313 Oslo Phone: +47 48 048 958
NORWAY Fax: +47 22 96 33 80
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/attachments/20160928/0e8bfca0/attachment.html>
Received on Wed Sep 28 2016 - 06:46:33 BST