⇐ ⇒

[CF-metadata] Proposed standard_name for river discharge

From: alison.pamment at stfc.ac.uk <alison.pamment>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 08:36:06 +0000

Yes, indeed. Thanks!

Best wishes,
Alison

------
Alison Pamment Tel: +44 1235 778065
Centre for Environmental Data Analysis Email: alison.pamment at stfc.ac.uk<mailto:J.A.Pamment at rl.ac.uk>
STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
R25, 2.22
Harwell Campus, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K.


From: John Helly [mailto:hellyj at ucsd.edu]
Sent: 11 May 2016 21:43
To: Pamment, Alison (STFC,RAL,RALSP); dblodgett at usgs.gov
Cc: cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu; j.m.gregory at reading.ac.uk
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Proposed standard_name for river discharge


Flood plain.

J

On 5/11/16 4:42 AM, alison.pamment at stfc.ac.uk<mailto:alison.pamment at stfc.ac.uk> wrote:

Dear Dave,



OK, thanks, I'll add that in.



Best wishes,

Alison



------

Alison Pamment Tel: +44 1235 778065

Centre for Environmental Data Analysis Email: alison.pamment at stfc.ac.uk<mailto:alison.pamment at stfc.ac.uk>

STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory

R25, 2.22

Harwell Campus, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K.







-----Original Message-----

From: David Blodgett [mailto:dblodgett at usgs.gov]

Sent: 11 May 2016 15:17

To: Pamment, Alison (STFC,RAL,RALSP)

Cc: rsignell at usgs.gov<mailto:rsignell at usgs.gov>; cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu<mailto:cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu>;

j.m.gregory at reading.ac.uk<mailto:j.m.gregory at reading.ac.uk>

Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Proposed standard_name for river discharge



I think ?in the river channel? should be ?in the river channel and flood plane?



Looks good otherwise.



On May 11, 2016, at 7:49 AM, alison.pamment at stfc.ac.uk<mailto:alison.pamment at stfc.ac.uk> wrote:



Dear Rich, All,



Thanks for proposing the river discharge name. The discussion so far

seems to be leading towards introducing a single name:

water_volume_transport_in_river (canonical units: m3 s-1).



At the moment we don't have a definition for this name so I'm suggesting

the following (based on existing definitions):

' The water flux or volume transport in rivers is the amount of water

flowing in the river channel. Water means water in all phases.'

Is this OK? Do we need to elaborate any further? I think if we can settle on

the definition, this name can be accepted for addition to the standard name

table.



Best wishes,

Alison



------

Alison Pamment Tel: +44 1235 778065

Centre for Environmental Data Analysis Email:

alison.pamment at stfc.ac.uk<mailto:alison.pamment at stfc.ac.uk>

STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory

R25, 2.22

Harwell Campus, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K.







-----Original Message-----

From: CF-metadata [mailto:cf-metadata-bounces at cgd.ucar.edu] On

Behalf

Of David Blodgett

Sent: 09 May 2016 15:08

To: Signell, Richard

Cc: CF metadata; Jonathan Gregory

Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Proposed standard_name for river discharge



I would wait till people have a use case that can drive specific names.



On May 9, 2016, at 8:00 AM, Signell, Richard <rsignell at usgs.gov><mailto:rsignell at usgs.gov> wrote:



Dave,

Do you think we should also introduce other water_volume_transport

quantities together to make this clear?



water_volume_transport_in_river_channel

water_volume_transport_over_land

water_volume_transport_in_???



-Rich



On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:14 AM, David Blodgett <dblodgett at usgs.gov><mailto:dblodgett at usgs.gov>

wrote:

I actually suggested ?in river channel? to rich because of the potential

to

segregate into flow in fluvial sediments below the channel or in a

floodplain disconnected from the channel, etc.



Cheers!



- Dave



On May 3, 2016, at 9:09 AM, Jonathan Gregory

<j.m.gregory at reading.ac.uk><mailto:j.m.gregory at reading.ac.uk> wrote:



Dear Rich



How about a new standard_name called:



"water_volume_transport_in_river_channel"



with canonical units "m3/s" ?



That's certainly a reasonable quantity to give a name too. Is "channel"

necessary?



Best wishes



Jonathan

_______________________________________________

CF-metadata mailing list

CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu<mailto:CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu>

http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata



_______________________________________________

CF-metadata mailing list

CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu<mailto:CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu>

http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata







--
Dr. Richard P. Signell   (508) 457-2229
USGS, 384 Woods Hole Rd.
Woods Hole, MA 02543-1598
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu<mailto:CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu>
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu<mailto:CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu>
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
--
John Helly, University of California, San Diego / San Diego Supercomputer Center / Scripps Institution of Oceanography / 760 840 8660 mobile / stonesteps (Skype) / stonesteps7 (iChat) / http://www.sdsc.edu/~hellyj
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/attachments/20160512/c6d9cace/attachment-0001.html>
Received on Thu May 12 2016 - 02:36:06 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Sep 13 2022 - 23:02:42 BST

⇐ ⇒