[CF-metadata] Proposed standard_name for river discharge

From: Jonathan Gregory <j.m.gregory>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 15:09:50 +0100

Dear Rich

> How about a new standard_name called:
>
> "water_volume_transport_in_river_channel"
>
> with canonical units "m3/s" ?

That's certainly a reasonable quantity to give a name too. Is "channel"
necessary?

Best wishes

Jonathan
Received on Tue May 03 2016 - 08:09:50 BST