⇐ ⇒

[CF-metadata] Standard Names for: Ocean Kinetic Energy and Relative Vorticity

From: Lowry, Roy K. <rkl>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 14:29:38 +0000

Dear Jonathan,

A minor point - should be distance_from_geocenter as established practice is to use US spellings.

Cheers, Roy.
________________________________________
From: Jonathan Gregory [j.m.gregory at reading.ac.uk]
Sent: 27 November 2014 14:17
To: cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Standard Names for: Ocean Kinetic Energy and Relative Vorticity

Dear Napoleon

> Ocean Kinetic Energy
> standard name: ocean_kinetic_energy
> unit: m2 s-2

With those units, this is specific kinetic energy i.e. per unit mass. There is
an existing stdname for this quantity viz specific_kinetic_energy_of_sea_water.

> Ocean Relative Vorticy
> standard name: ocean_relative_vorticity
> unit: s-1

That's analogous to atmosphere_relative_vorticity so I think it's fine.

> Gravity Potential Gradient
> standard name: gravity_potential_gradient
> unit: s-2

There is an existing stdname of specific_gravitational_potential_energy
in J kg-1 = m2 s-2. Since taking a gradient has a sign and direction, your
quantity could be called
  upward_derivative_of_specific_gravitational_potential_energy
for consistency with other names for derivatives, and it's in m s-2, isn't it?
- not s-2. However this quantity could also, more familiarly, be called the
acceleration_due_to_gravity i.e. g. Is it g you mean? I suppose g is the
vertical derivative of geopotential, which isn't quite the same as GPE. Are
you making a distinction here?

> Radius from Geocenter
> standard_name: radius_from_geocenter
> unit: m

I would suggest calling this distance_from_geocentre. A radius is a property
of a geometrical figure, not a distance between two points.

Best wishes

Jonathan
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system.
Received on Thu Nov 27 2014 - 07:29:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Sep 13 2022 - 23:02:42 BST

⇐ ⇒