⇐ ⇒

[CF-metadata] geostationary vs vertical_perspective in CF 1.7.

From: Randy Horne <rhorne>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 20:28:53 -0500

John:

geostationary projection and vertical perspective projections are not the same.

an example of a vertical projection image is one taken by a camera in space, which is not necessarily at the equator, and the data for the entire image is observed using a single exposure.

the geostationary projection is that associated with scanning imagers from geostationary orbit where each image pixel covers a fixed number of radians/degrees in east/west and north/south relative to the camera?s aperture.

very respectfully,

randy



On Nov 18, 2014, at 3:19 PM, John Caron <caron at ucar.edu> wrote:

> CF TRAC ticket 72 defines "geostationary projection", accepted for 1.7.
>
> 1) I _think_ that "Vertical Perspective" is an earlier version of this, and it should be deprecated in favor of "geostationary". Does anyone have a different opinion?
>
> 2) The draft 1.7 does not yet include it, so its been hard to refer users to it.
>
> http://cfconventions.org/Data/cf-conventions/cf-conventions-1.7/build/cf-conventions.html#appendix-grid-mappings
> _______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list
> CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata


____________________________________

Randy C. Horne (rhorne at excaliburlabs.com)
Principal Engineer, Excalibur Laboratories Inc.
voice & fax: (321) 952.5100
url: http://www.excaliburlabs.com




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/attachments/20141118/2cf7d346/attachment.html>
Received on Tue Nov 18 2014 - 18:28:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Sep 13 2022 - 23:02:42 BST

⇐ ⇒