⇐ ⇒

[CF-metadata] CF upgrade to netCDF variable names

From: Steve Hankin <steven.c.hankin>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 09:37:41 -0800

On 1/15/2014 9:24 AM, Jim Biard wrote:
> Chris,
>
> The point is, the Conventions themselves state that there is *no
> standard*. People are all the time trying to add meaning to variable
> names, but the standard actually states that the meaning is to reside
> in the attributes. The variable names are just keys for
> differentiating the variables. (I could name all my variables
> "vNNNNNNNNNN", where N is a digit, and I would be completely valid
> according to the standard.) The long_name and standard_name
> attributes are the places where descriptors of the variable content
> are to be found.
>
> So I'm raising a question. _ Is there actually anything other than
> sentiment (i.e., an actual rule) that anyone can point to that
> prevents someone from using "new" characters in their variable names?_

How about the lines from the CF document that you cut-pasted (thank you):

    /Variable, dimension and attribute names should begin with a letter
    and be composed of letters, digits, and underscores. Note that this
    is in conformance with the COARDS conventions, but is more
    restrictive than the netCDF interface which allows use of the hyphen
    character. The netCDF interface also allows leading underscores in
    names, but the NUG states that this is reserved for system use./

     - Steve
>
> Grace and peace,
>
> Jim
>
> CICS-NC <http://www.cicsnc.org/>Visit us on
> Facebook <http://www.facebook.com/cicsnc> *Jim Biard*
> *Research Scholar*
> Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites NC <http://cicsnc.org/>
> North Carolina State University <http://ncsu.edu/>
> NOAA's National Climatic Data Center <http://ncdc.noaa.gov/>
> 151 Patton Ave, Asheville, NC 28801
> e: jbiard at cicsnc.org <mailto:jbiard at cicsnc.org>
> o: +1 828 271 4900
>
>
>
>
>
> On Jan 15, 2014, at 12:00 PM, Chris Barker <chris.barker at noaa.gov
> <mailto:chris.barker at noaa.gov>> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 7:39 AM, jbiard <jbiard at mail.cicsnc.org
>> <mailto:jbiard at mail.cicsnc.org>> wrote:
>>
>> I don't think we should use ease of mapping variable names to a
>> programming language as a reason for allowing (or not allowing)
>> any particular character in variable names.
>>
>> Why not? maybe not a compelling reason, but I can't imagine a
>> compelling reason to have more flexible naming conventions, either.
>>
>> CF has, as I understood it, considered variable names as
>> completely up to the producer, relying on attributes to provide
>> meaning. So, I can name a temperature variable "fluffy_bunny" if
>> I want to, and it is completely valid.
>>
>> valid yes, a good idea? probably not.
>>
>> Section 1.3 of the Conventions states, "No variable or dimension
>> names are standardized by this convention."
>>
>> so there are no standard variable names -- that's not the same as
>> standards for variable names....
>>
>> Personally, I wish there were standards for variable names, it would
>> make it easier to code against -- but that cat's out of the bag. But
>> this cat isn't: the restiricitons have been there for a long time, so
>> the question now is:
>>
>> what are the reasons for easing those restrictions?
>>
>> and
>>
>> what are the reasons for keeping those restrictions?
>>
>> we've given a few reasons for keeping them (maybe not all that
>> compeling toyou, but reasons none the less) -- what are the reasons
>> for relaxing them, other than "I like this naming convention that is
>> currently not allowed" ?
>>
>> I'm not convinced that "fluffy-bunny" is any more readable or
>> anything else than "fluffy_bunny"
>>
>> -Chris
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
>> Oceanographer
>>
>> Emergency Response Division
>> NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice
>> 7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax
>> Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception
>>
>> Chris.Barker at noaa.gov <mailto:Chris.Barker at noaa.gov>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CF-metadata mailing list
>> CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu <mailto:CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu>
>> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list
> CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/attachments/20140115/5221d62a/attachment-0001.html>
Received on Wed Jan 15 2014 - 10:37:41 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Sep 13 2022 - 23:02:41 BST

⇐ ⇒