I'm currently working with a group looking at profiling glider date a files from multiple countries. We've identified a similar need to differentiate qc tests on a per variable basis. I support the idea and the problem and I suppose one solution is the conventions attribute.
Regards,
Derrick
"Lowry, Roy K." <rkl at bodc.ac.uk> wrote:
>Dear All,
>
>Currently, the 'Conventions' attribute is restricted to be a global
>attribute. There is currently a requirement to label multiple QC flag
>variables following different conventions with their source convention
>and having the 'Conventions' attribute as a variable attribute for
>these non-co-ordinate variables would seem a convenient and consistent
>mechanism. Is there any support for or objections to this suggestion?
>
>Cheers, Roy.
>
>Please note that I now work part-time from Tuesday to Thursday. E-mail
>response on other days is possible but not guaranteed!
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC is
>subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents of this
>email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless it is
>exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to NERC may be
>stored in an electronic records management system.
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>CF-metadata mailing list
>CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
>http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/attachments/20130123/1ca4243a/attachment.html>
Received on Wed Jan 23 2013 - 05:09:07 GMT
