⇐ ⇒

[CF-metadata] inclusion of GridSpec in CF?

From: Signell, Richard <rsignell>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 13:43:54 -0500

I will pass this along to the UGRID google group also.
-Rich

On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Alexander Pletzer <pletzer at txcorp.com> wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> Let me review this again. I will get back to you next week.
>
> --Alex
>
>
>
>
>
> On 11/26/2012 10:02 AM, Jonathan Gregory wrote:
>>
>> Dear Alex
>>
>> Would it be possible to agree some changes from what we previously agreed
>> on
>> your ticket, following the discussions we had earlier this year about the
>> correspondence between gridspec and ugrid? Although ugrid is not yet
>> proposed
>> to CF, I think it would be beneficial if we could anticipate both being
>> added
>> to CF. They have several similarities in principle and it will be easier
>> for
>> users, I expect, if their conventions look similar in practice. I
>> appreciate
>> that reopening the ticket means extra work at this stage.
>>
>> My comments, arising from our webex discussion of similarities and
>> differences
>> between gridspec and ugrid, are at
>> http://www.met.rdg.ac.uk/~jonathan/CF_metadata/ugrid_gridspec.html
>>
>> Best wishes
>>
>> Jonathan
>> _______________________________________________
>> CF-metadata mailing list
>> CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
>> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list
> CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata



-- 
Dr. Richard P. Signell   (508) 457-2229
USGS, 384 Woods Hole Rd.
Woods Hole, MA 02543-1598
Received on Mon Nov 26 2012 - 11:43:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Sep 13 2022 - 23:02:41 BST

⇐ ⇒