⇐ ⇒

[CF-metadata] Proposal for standard name "snow_cover_binary_mask"

From: Lowry, Roy K. <rkl>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2012 19:50:58 +0100

Suggestion 'presence_of_surface_snow' should have been 'presence_of_surface_snow_cover' to maintain consistency....
________________________________________
From: CF-metadata [cf-metadata-bounces at cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of Lowry, Roy K. [rkl at bodc.ac.uk]
Sent: 05 September 2012 19:49
To: Ute Br?nner; Jim Biard
Cc: Heather Brown; Raymond Nepstad; cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu; Alisa Young
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Proposal for standard name "snow_cover_binary_mask"

Dear All,

It's becoming clear that we need a Standard Name component to cover boolean values whose trigger point may then be specified elsewhere as Jonathan stated. In the biological domain, the syntax 'presence_of_x' where x is a taxon name is often used. Could this be adopted giving the Standard Name 'presence_of_surface_snow' for Jim and opening the door for a raft of Standard Names to cover Ute's use case?

Cheers, Roy.

________________________________________
From: CF-metadata [cf-metadata-bounces at cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of Ute Br?nner [Ute.Broenner at sintef.no]
Sent: 05 September 2012 18:40
To: Jim Biard
Cc: Heather Brown; Raymond Nepstad; cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu; Alisa Young
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Proposal for standard name "snow_cover_binary_mask"

Hei,
Wouldn't that feature come in handy for other grids as well where we would like to mark sth. like "exposed" or "not exposed"? So I would suggest to make it snow independent.

Regards,
Ute


Am 05.09.2012 um 18:31 schrieb "Jim Biard" <jim.biard at noaa.gov<mailto:jim.biard at noaa.gov>>:

Hi.

I'd like to propose the new standard name "snow_cover_binary_mask". There is a NOAA snow coverage extent product that is being put into netCDF format. The product is derived from the IMS Daily Northern Hemisphere Snow & Ice Analysis. It is a grid in which cells are marked as snow-covered or not snow-covered. The GCMD already has the keywords "Cryosphere > Snow/Ice > Snow Cover" and "Terrestrial Hydrosphere > Snow/Ice > Snow Cover", which are applied to the source product.

In this particular product, grid cells are marked as snow-covered when > 42% of the cell indicates the presence of snow.

I'd appreciate any thoughts or comments.

Grace and peace,

Jim

Jim Biard
Research Scholar
Cooperative Institute for Climate and Satellites
Remote Sensing and Applications Division
National Climatic Data Center
151 Patton Ave, Asheville, NC 28801-5001

jim.biard at noaa.gov<mailto:jim.biard at noaa.gov>
828-271-4900

_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu<mailto:CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu>
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata--
This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC
is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents
of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless
it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to
NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system.
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
Received on Wed Sep 05 2012 - 12:50:58 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Sep 13 2022 - 23:02:41 BST

⇐ ⇒