Dear Jonathan,
Am 2012-05-14 16:34, schrieb Jonathan Gregory:
>> Surface reflectance is normalised: the surface reflectance
>> is derived for a given standardised view observation geometry.
>> Compared to this surface albedo is the integral of the BRDF over all
>> viewing and illumination directions of a hemisphere.
>>
>> So our proposal for "surface_reflectance" remains:
> Since they are distinct and well-defined, I agree they need different
> standard names. I notice we also have an existing standard name
> toa_bidirectional_reflectance
> Perhaps yours should include "bidirectional" as well, for clarity and
> consistency?
fine with me. Depending on how specific we shall be we may call it
"normalised_surface_bidirectional_reflectance" or just
"surface_bidirectional_reflectance".
>> We agree to introduce a new standard name. Our proposal is
>> "land_cover_lccs". The reference to the LCCS standard maintained by
>> FAO is http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/003/X0596E/X0596e00.htm .
> Good. I think this is the right approach, but I'd suggest unlccs_land_cover
> (or faolccs_land_cover) because
> * "un" (or "fao") would indicate it is specific to a particular scheme.
> * it resembles the existing name isccp_cloud_area_fraction.
Fine with me, too, to call it unlccs_land_cover.
Best regards,
Martin
--
Dr. Martin Boettcher
Brockmann Consult GmbH
Max-Planck-Stra?e 2
D-21502 Geesthacht
Tel: +49 (0)4152 889 315
Fax: +49 (0)4152 889 333
www.brockmann-consult.de
Amtsgericht Geesthacht HRB 698
Gesch?ftsf?hrer Dr. Carsten Brockmann
Received on Mon May 14 2012 - 12:08:41 BST
