I personally have no objections, but acting as an ad hoc
moderator-lite, does Randy's suggestion from the 22nd March need
agreeing on, one way or another?
All the best
David
---- Original message from John Caron (10AM 10 May 12)
> Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 10:35:04 -0600
> From: John Caron <caron at unidata.ucar.edu>
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428
> Thunderbird/12.0.1
> To: "cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu" <cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu>
> Subject: [CF-metadata] Accept geostationary projection
>
> If no one has any objections, i move that we accept this ticket:
>
> "Adding the geostationary projection."
>
> https://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/trac/ticket/72
>
> the changes needed to the spec are at the bottom of the ticket, we
> didnt know how to change the top part.
> _______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list
> CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
--
David Hassell
National Centre for Atmospheric Science (NCAS)
Department of Meteorology, University of Reading,
Earley Gate, PO Box 243,
Reading RG6 6BB, U.K.
Tel : 0118 3785613
Fax : 0118 3788316
E-mail: d.c.hassell at reading.ac.uk
Received on Thu May 10 2012 - 12:10:20 BST
