⇐ ⇒

[CF-metadata] surface_air_pressure vs air_pressure_at_sea_level

From: Lowry, Roy K. <rkl>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:10:31 +0000

Hi Nan,

I must admit that I've always regarded any oceanographic barometric pressure from ships or met buoys to be 'sea level pressure'. The only time I've given the z co-ordinate a thought was for some oil platform data until I discovered the data had been corrected to sea level, as are many terrestrial barometers through a correction built into the instrument.

Cheers, Roy.

From: cf-metadata-bounces at cgd.ucar.edu [mailto:cf-metadata-bounces at cgd.ucar.edu] On Behalf Of Karl Taylor
Sent: 14 March 2012 23:46
To: ngalbraith at whoi.edu
Cc: cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] surface_air_pressure vs air_pressure_at_sea_level

Hi Nan,

"surface_air_pressure" could be measured anywhere on the earth by measuring the air pressure with a sensor placed on the ground. You will find that a map of surface air pressure looks a lot like the topographical height field but with opposite sign (so that the pressure at the top of mountains is low and at sea level, relatively high).

air_pressure at sea_level can only be directly measured over the oceans (or land surface at the same altitude as sea level). Elsewhere, sea level pressure must be calculated, primarily accounting for the difference in altitude between the earth's surface and sea level.

Over the oceans, surface air pressure and sea level pressure are the same, at least for the real Earth. In spectral models the elevation of the ocean surface undulates ("rings") a bit, especially near coasts with high mountains (like the Andes). Since the elevation in these models is not uniform over the ocean, the surface pressure isn't the same as sea level pressure anywhere and you have to again calculate the sea level pressure.

The sea level pressure is important because on a weather map, you can infer much about the weather (unless you are close to the equator). The sea level pressure mostly shows you where the mountains are and is less interesting dynamically. The surface pressure, however, is usually one of the prognostic variables in models (maybe not for z-coordinate model though), and is needed for solving the model equations.

regards,
Karl


On 3/14/12 8:19 AM, Nan Galbraith wrote:

Hi all -



I have a question about the use of the terms 'sea_level' and

'surface' in the following definitions:

air_pressure_at_sea_level: sea_level means mean sea level, which

is close to the geoid in sea areas. Air pressure at sea level is the

quantity often abbreviated as MSLP or PMSL.



surface_air_pressure: The surface called "surface" means the

lower boundary of the atmosphere.



The question is, does 'at_sea_level' imply a Z axis value of 0? And,

is the term 'surface' the equivalent of sea_level, except that it includes

areas over land? Or, is it somehow ... less exact?



If we're measuring BPR at around 2 meters, would we need to correct

the values to what the measurement would have been if the sensor

was at the actual sea surface, to use the term air_pressure_at_sea_level?



Or, is it acceptable to provide a Z axis coordinate and use the term

at_sea_level?



Thanks -

Nan






-- 
This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC
is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents
of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless
it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to
NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/attachments/20120315/83f65165/attachment.html>
Received on Thu Mar 15 2012 - 06:10:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Sep 13 2022 - 23:02:41 BST

⇐ ⇒