Okay, I have overcome my writer's block and started this ticket #76:
https://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/trac/ticket/76
Please feel free to join the discussion on the trac ticket, if you are
interested in this topic.
--Dave A.
NOAA/PSD/CIRES
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Dave Allured <dave.allured at noaa.gov> wrote:
> I will be glad to open a trac ticket. ?Let me have a day or so draft
> some amendment wording. ?My intention is to use Unidata's
> recommendations in the NetCDF Users Guide as a starting point, and
> include notes about conformance and avoiding conflicts.
>
> --Dave
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Jonathan Gregory
> <j.m.gregory at reading.ac.uk> wrote:
>> Dear all - such as Roy, John (Graybeal) and Mark (Hedley)
>>
>> Would someone have time to open a trac ticket to propose a change to the CF
>> convention, in order to clarify the Conventions attribute, following all this
>> useful email discussion? It seems to me that it would be good to make a
>> definite decision. I think it's been recognised that, whatever the syntax, it
>> is up to the data-writer to ensure that multiple conventions do not conflict,
>> so we ought to state this as well as defining the permissible syntax.
>>
>> Best wishes
>>
>> Jonathan
Received on Tue Jan 24 2012 - 23:50:18 GMT
