[CF-metadata] physical vs dimensional units
This message
: [
Message body
] [ More options (
top
,
bottom
) ]
Related messages
: [
Next message
] [
Previous message
] [
In reply to
] [
Next in thread
] [
Replies
]
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
From
: Steve Emmerson <
steve
>
Date
: Sat, 02 Apr 2011 10:32:43 -0600
Dear CF'ers,
On 04/02/2011 05:42 AM, Jonathan Gregory wrote:
> I don't really agree with this. Units are units, not descriptins of quantities.
The National Institute of Science and Technology (NIST) agrees that
information shouldn't be attached to unit specifications. See
<
http://physics.nist.gov/Pubs/SP811/sec07.html#7.4
> and
<
http://physics.nist.gov/Pubs/SP811/sec07.html#7.5
> for more information.
Regards,
Steve Emmerson
Received on
Sat Apr 02 2011 - 10:32:43 BST
This message
: [
Message body
]
Next message
:
Steve Hankin: "[CF-metadata] physical vs dimensional units"
Previous message
:
Jonathan Gregory: "[CF-metadata] physical vs dimensional units"
In reply to
:
Jonathan Gregory: "[CF-metadata] physical vs dimensional units"
Next in thread
:
Steve Hankin: "[CF-metadata] physical vs dimensional units"
Reply
:
Steve Hankin: "[CF-metadata] physical vs dimensional units"
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
This archive was generated by
hypermail 2.3.0
: Tue Sep 13 2022 - 23:02:41 BST