-- Dr. Richard P. Signell (508) 457-2229 USGS, 384 Woods Hole Rd. Woods Hole, MA 02543-1598 > I'll be happy to contribute to the discussion as well as good as I can! > > Best regards, > Ute > > Ute Br?nner > www.sintef.com/marine_environment > > ? ?Consider the environment before printing > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Caron [mailto:caron at unidata.ucar.edu] > Sent: Dienstag, 12. Oktober 2010 19:31 > To: Rich Signell > Cc: Ute Br?nner; Jonathan Gregory; cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu > Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] point observation data in CF 1.4 > > ?Hi Ute: > > 1. ?im not sure what this means: " I now finally find out that the new > approaches of Netcdf 4 are not implemented in the Java API, yet." > > 2. I would have thought "3D particle tracking" would be a trajectory. > how is it different? > > John > > On 10/11/2010 4:24 AM, Rich Signell wrote: >> Ute, >> >> I was thinking that you could use the proposed convention in 9.3.2 as >> a workaround, with the "station" being each record. ? But I see now >> that the coordinate variables for lon, lat need to be a function of >> station, so as you say, that won't work. >> >> Clearly there is a need for another Point Convention type to handle >> the output from particle tracking models like this. ?I can think of at >> least four models that would benefit from this convention right now, >> including the NSF RAPID grant we are working on for 3D particle >> tracking using LTRANS for the Deepwater Horizon Spill. >> >> _at_Jonathan, Caron& ?Hankin: Can we revive your discussion? ?I'd be >> happy to participate. >> >> -Rich >> >> On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 4:05 AM, Ute Br?nner<Ute.Broenner at sintef.no> ?wrote: >>> Hei Rich, >>> >>> I found that convention before, this was what I mentioned to Jonathan. >>> But first of all, this is not convention, yet, and secondly I have no stations but a varying set of observations per timestep (neither stations nor trajectories). I now write the data with redundant time as a limited dimension, and records(time, latitude, longitude) and have >>> mass (record), radius(record) etc. >>> >>> Thanks anyway, >>> Ute >>> >>> Ute Br?nner >>> www.sintef.com/marine_environment >>> >>> ? ?Consider the environment before printing >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: rsignell at gmail.com [mailto:rsignell at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Rich Signell >>> Sent: Freitag, 8. Oktober 2010 13:59 >>> To: Ute Br?nner >>> Cc: Jonathan Gregory; cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu; John Caron >>> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] point observation data in CF 1.4 >>> >>> Ute, >>> >>> On this page: >>> https://cf-pcmdi.llnl.gov/trac/wiki/PointObservationConventions >>> >>> It appears that your case *might* be handled by: >>> >>> 9.3.2 Ragged array (contiguous) representation >>> >>> I'm pretty sure that this "ragged_row_count" feature *is* included in >>> NetCDF-Java, but John Caron (cc'd here) could confirm. >>> >>> Please report back to this group if you find success (or perhaps even >>> if you don't!) >>> >>> Thanks, >>> -Rich >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 3:15 AM, Ute Br?nner<Ute.Broenner at sintef.no> ?wrote: >>>> Jonathan, >>>> thanks for your answer! My troubles were related to shape and dimensions. >>>> I now finally find out that the new approaches of Netcdf 4 are not implemented in the Java API, yet. >>>> I now use a record dimension which is unlimited and a limited time dimension. Hope that works, otherwise, I have your address now :-) >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> Ute >>>> >>>> Ute Br?nner >>>> www.sintef.com/marine_environment >>>> >>>> ? ?Consider the environment before printing >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Jonathan Gregory [mailto:jonathan at met.reading.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Jonathan Gregory >>>> Sent: Mittwoch, 6. Oktober 2010 19:13 >>>> To: Ute Br?nner >>>> Cc: cf-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu >>>> Subject: [CF-metadata] point observation data in CF 1.4 >>>> >>>> Dear Ute >>>> >>>> You are right, the convention for timeseries of different lengths being >>>> contained in one variable is not yet agreed. Some months ago John Caron, Steve >>>> Hankin and I discussed it at length but did not quite manage to finish it, >>>> unfortunately. So there isn't a CF convention for it at the moment. >>>> >>>>> but I have some trouble in writing the data. >>>> What kind of trouble? >>>> >>>> Best wishes >>>> >>>> Jonathan >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> CF-metadata mailing list >>>> CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu >>>> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Dr. Richard P. Signell ? (508) 457-2229 >>> USGS, 384 Woods Hole Rd. >>> Woods Hole, MA 02543-1598 >>> >> >> > >Received on Wed Oct 13 2010 - 05:30:36 BST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Sep 13 2022 - 23:02:41 BST