⇐ ⇒

[CF-metadata] a different (but perhaps unoriginal) approach to standard name construction

From: Heinke Hoeck <heinke.hoeck>
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 11:32:26 +0100

Dear Jonathan,
do you like to discuss this?
>
> * I listed in another thread some questions that Stephen Griffies and I have
> been discussing for ocean quantities for CMIP5. These are the kind of
> decisions that took most time, not actually stringing together a name:
> - Basin masks for tracer and velocity are the same geophysical quantity, but
> distinguished by coordinates.
> - What does "ideal age" of sea water mean?
> - Is the mixed-layer depth determined by a buoyancy criterion the same concept
> as mixed-layer depth determined by sigma-theta?
> - Transports across various straits are all the same geophysical quantity, and
> the strait should be identified by some string-valued coordinate.
> - How do we most usefully categorise the various kinds of ocean mixing in a
> way which will be helpful for comparing models?
> - What is the clearest way to describe the energetics of vertical mixing: is
> it the rate of work against stratification, or the rate of change of potential
> energy?
>
Best wishes
Heinke
Received on Tue Nov 04 2008 - 03:32:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Sep 13 2022 - 23:02:40 BST

⇐ ⇒