Hi Seth
I don't think we should assume that a URN necessarily needs to be
resolvable (referenceable?) across the internet in order for a software
application to work with it. If an application 'understands' the meaning
of a particular URN then all's well.
It would be perfectly feasible for an organisation to maintain a local
cache of URNs, perhaps updated from the central authority on a periodic
basis. In a way, this is exactly what geospatial solutions such as ESRI
ArcGIS and Oracle Spatial do already. These products maintain copies of
the OGC CRS entities in local text files and/or rdbms tables. The CRS
entities are sufficiently slow-changing to make this a practical
solution.
Reductio ad absurdum, one could even hard-code URNs into a software
application that needs them, but I don't think this approach would find
many advocates!
Cheers
--Phil
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 18:06 -0600, mcginnis at ucar.edu wrote:
> > I think that the description of the coord ref system in terms of projection,
> > ellipsoid and vertical datum can't be dispensed with until the day when it is
> > no more difficult to look it up on the net than it is to read it
> > directly from
> > the file. Until then, the information has to be in the file to make the file
> > self-describing, and I would say that day is a long way off, when one
> > considers
> > all the applications, some of them simple user-written programs, that want to
> > use the netCDF files.
>
>
> I think this is a really important point.
>
> Consider that "just as easy to look it up on the net" implies not only
> that users whose systems are not URN-aware can find out where to look
> without much effort, but also that systems using NetCDF data have a net
> connection that can quickly and reliably reach a server providing that
> information.
>
> A URN is great if you're sitting at your desk using a program that will
> look it up for you. If you're *writing* a program that does something
> with the data, or if you're working someplace without easy internet
> access, or if for some reason your net connection can't get to whatever
> OGC site defines it, the URN may be no better than saying simply 'geoid
> = "WGS 1984"'. (Pity the hypothetical programmer working on code for
> an autonomous submersible that talks to data-collection buoys...)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Seth
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list
> CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
> http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/pipermail/cf-metadata/attachments/20071004/4dfb8e3f/attachment-0002.html>
Received on Thu Oct 04 2007 - 03:31:12 BST
