Hi,
I am using your CF standard_name table to convert ECMWF names to CF
names. Your table is very useful as it already contains some the ECMWF
GRIB numbers. I have though noted a few mistakes (e.g. 176, 177) and
quite a few obmissions.missing in web page (238, 169, 210, 211, 152,
205 and more). You might want to update the table accordingly. I am
attaching my correspondence table for CEOP. Note that on this table a
few variables are accumulated in the ECMWF GRIB table but are converted
to time derivatives in the CEOP table.
Thanks,
- Martin
ps: more info
Your table:
http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/cms/eaton/cf-metadata/standard_name.html
ECMWF table:
http://www.ecmwf.int/publications/manuals/libraries/tables/localTable128.html
Your current variable correspondence to ECMWF numbers:
E129
E130
E131
E132
E133
E134
E135
E137
E138
E139
E140
E141
E142
E143
E144
E145
E146
E147
E151
E155
E156
E157
E158
E164
E172
E173
E174
E176
E177
E178
E179
E180
E181
E182
E185
Received on Mon Nov 21 2005 - 04:13:55 GMT
