⇐ ⇒

[CF-metadata] standard name proposals

From: Brian Eaton <eaton>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2003 12:56:55 -0600

Hi Jonathan,

Having packed data in the range 1024-1028 and using an add_offset of -1000
was John's suggestion. His point (I think) is that applications using this
data expect the unpacked values to be in the range 24-28.

Brian

On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 07:36:01PM +0100, Jonathan Gregory wrote:
> Dear Brian
>
> > By convention the units associated with a variable are the units of the
> > unpacked data. Using an add_offset of -1000 with packed data values of
> > 1024-1028 implies that the true values of density and potential density are
> > in the range 24-28 kg/m3, which is not correct.
>
> Would it not be the other way round? The density values are stored as numbers
> in the range 24-28 kg m-3 i.e. as sigma-theta, with add_offset of +1000. Once
> the offset has been added, they are values in the range 1024-1028, matching
> their standard name of sea_water_potential_density.
>
> Cheers
>
> Jonathan
> _______________________________________________
> CF-metadata mailing list
> CF-metadata at cgd.ucar.edu
> http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
Received on Thu Aug 07 2003 - 12:56:55 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Sep 13 2022 - 23:02:40 BST

⇐ ⇒